Thank you very much, Senator Fulbright, Senator Javits,
Senator Symington and Senator Pell.I would like to
say for the record, and also for the men sitting behind
me who are also wearing the uniforms and their medals,
that my sitting here is really symbolic. I am not here
as John Kerry. I am here as one member of a group of
1,000, which is a small representation of a very much
larger group of veterans in this country, and were it
possible for all of them to sit at this table, they
would be here and have the same kind of testimony. I
would simply like to speak in general terms. I apologize
if my statement is general because I received
notification [only] yesterday that you would hear me,
and, I am afraid, because of the injunction I was up
most of the night and haven't had a great deal of chance
to prepare.
I would like to talk, representing all those
veterans, and say that several months ago, in Detroit,
we had an investigation at which over 150 honorably
discharged, and many very highly decorated, veterans
testified to war crimes committed in Southeast Asia.
These were not isolated incidents, but crimes committed
on a day-to-day basis, with the full awareness of
officers at all levels of command. It is impossible to
describe to you exactly what did happen in Detroit--the
emotions in the room, and the feelings of the men who
were reliving their experiences in Vietnam. They relived
the absolute horror of what this country, in a sense,
made them do.
They told stories that, at times, they had personally
raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped wires from
portable telephones to human genitals and turned up the
power, cut off limbs, blown up bodies, randomly shot at
civilians, razed villages in fashion reminiscent of
Ghengis Khan, shot cattle and dogs for fun, poisoned
food stocks, and generally ravaged the countryside of
South Vietnam,in addition to the normal ravage of war
and the normal and very particular ravaging which is
done by the applied bombing power of this country.
We call this investigation the Winter Soldier
Investigation. The term "winter soldier" is a play on
words of Thomas Paine's in 1776, when he spoke of the
"sunshine patriots," and "summertime soldiers" who
deserted at Valley Forge because the going was rough.
We who have come here to Washington have come here
because we feel we have to be winter soldiers now. We
could come back to this country, we could be quiet, we
could hold our silence, we could not tell what went on
in Vietnam, but we feel, because of what threatens this
country, not the reds, but the crimes which we are
committing that threaten it, that we have to speak out.
I would like to talk to you a little bit about what
the result is of the feelings these men carry with them
after coming back from Vietnam. The country doesn't know
it yet, but it has created a monster, a monster in the
form of millions of men who have been taught to deal and
to trade in violence, and who are given the chance to
die for the biggest nothing in history; men who have
returned with a sense of anger and a sense of betrayal
which no one has yet grasped.
As a veteran and one who felt this anger, I would
like to talk about it. We are angry because we feel we
have been used it the worst fashion by the
administration of this country.
In 1970, at West Point, Vice President Agnew said,
"some glamorize the criminal misfits of society while
our best men die in Asian rice paddies to preserve the
freedom which most of those misfits abuse," and this was
used as a rallying point for our effort in Vietnam.
But for us, as boys in Asia whom the country was
supposed to support, his statement is a terrible
distortion from which we can only draw a very deep sense
of revulsion. Hence the anger of some of the men who are
here in Washington today. It is a distortion because we
in no way consider ourselves the best men of this
country, because those he calls misfits were standing up
for us in a way that nobody else in this country dared
to, because so many who have died would have returned to
this country to join the misfits in their efforts to ask
for an immediate withdrawal from South Vietnam, because
so many of those best men have returned as quadriplegics
and amputees, and they lie forgotten in Veterans'
Administration hospitals in this country which fly the
flag which so many have chosen as their own personal
symbol. And we cannot consider ourselves America's best
men when we are ashamed of and hated what we were called
on to do in Southeast Asia.
In our opinion, and from our experience, there is
nothing in South Vietnam which could happen that
realistically threatens the United States of America.
And to attempt to justify the loss of one American life
in Vietnam, Cambodia, or Laos by linking such loss to
the preservation of freedom, which those misfits
supposedly abuse, is to us the height of criminal
hypocrisy, and it is that kind of hypocrisy which we
feel has torn this country apart.
We found that not only was it a civil war, an effort
by a people who had for years been seeking their
liberation from any colonial influence whatsoever, but,
also, we found that the Vietnamese, whom we had
enthusiastically molded after our own image, were
hard-put to take up the fight against the threat we were
supposedly saving them from.
We found most people didn't even know the difference
between communism and democracy. They only wanted to
work in rice paddies without helicopters strafing them
and bombs with napalm burning their villages and tearing
their country apart. They wanted everything to do with
the war, particularly with this foreign presence of the
United States of America, to leave them alone in peace,
and they practiced the art of survival by siding with
whichever military force was present at a particular
time, be it Viet Cong, North Vietnamese or American.
We found also that, all too often, American men were
dying in those rice paddies for want of support from
their allies. We saw first hand how monies from American
taxes were used for a corrupt dictatorial regime. We saw
that many people in this country had a one-sided idea of
who was kept free by the flag, and blacks provided the
highest percentage of casualties. We saw Vietnam ravaged
equally by American bombs and search-and-destroy
missions as well as by Viet Cong terrorism, - and yet we
listened while this country tried to blame all of the
havoc on the Viet Cong.
We rationalized destroying villages in order to save
them. We saw America lose her sense of morality as she
accepted very coolly a
My Lai, and
refused to give up the image of American soldiers who
hand out chocolate bars and chewing gum.
We learned the meaning of free-fire zones--shooting
anything that moves--and we watched while America placed
a cheapness on the lives of orientals.
We watched the United States falsification of body
counts, in fact the glorification of body counts. We
listened while, month after month, we were told the back
of the enemy was about to break. We fought using weapons
against "oriental
human beings" with quotation marks around that. We
fought using weapons against those people which I do not
believe this country would dream of using, were we
fighting in the European theater. We watched while men
charged up hills because a general said that hill has to
be taken, and, after losing one platoon, or two
platoons, they marched away to leave the hill for
reoccupation by the North Vietnamese. We watched pride
allow the most unimportant battles to be blown into
extravaganzas, because we couldn't lose, and we couldn't
retreat, and because it didn't matter how many American
bodies were lost to prove that point, and so there were
Hamburger Hills and Khe Sanhs and Hill 81s and Fire Base
6s, and so many others.
Now we are told that the men who fought there must
watch quietly while American lives are lost so that we
can exercise the incredible arrogance of "Vietnamizing"
the Vietnamese.
Each day, to facilitate the process by which the
United States washes her hands of Vietnam, someone has
to give up his life so that the United States doesn't
have to admit something that the entire world already
knows, so that we can't say that we have made a mistake.
Someone has to die so that President Nixon won't be, and
these are his words, "the first President to lose a
war."
_______________
Where is the leadership?
We're here to ask where are McNamara,
Rostow, Bundy, Gilpatrick, and so many others?
_______________
We are asking Americans to think about that, because
how do you ask a man to be the last man to die in
Vietnam? How do you ask a man to be the last man to die
for a mistake? We are here in Washington to say that the
problem of this war is not just a question of war and
diplomacy. It is part and parcel of everything that we
are trying, as human beings, to communicate to people in
this country--the question of racism, which is rampant
in the military, and so many other questions, such as
the use of weapons: the hypocrisy in our taking umbrage
at the Geneva Conventions and using that as
justification for a continuation of this war, when we
are more guilty than any other body of violations of
those Geneva Conventions; in the use of free-fire zones;
harassment-interdiction fire, search-and-destroy
missions; the bombings; the torture of prisoners; all
accepted policy by many units in South Vietnam. That is
what we are trying to say. It is part and parcel of
everything.
An American Indian friend of mine who lives in the
Indian Nation of Alcatraz put it to me very succinctly:
He told me how, as a boy on an Indian reservation, he
had watched television, and he used to cheer the cowboys
when they came in and shot the Indians, and then
suddenly one day he stopped in Vietnam and he said, "my
God, I am doing to these people the very same thing that
was done to my people," and he stopped. And that is what
we are trying to say, that we think this thing has to
end.
_______________
The Army says they never leave their wounded.
The Marines say they never even leave their dead.
These men have left all the casualties
and retreated behind a pious shield of public
rectitude.
_______________
We are here to ask, and we are here to ask
vehemently, where are the leaders of our country? Where
is the leadership? We're here to ask where are McNamara,
Rostow, Bundy, Gilpatrick, and so many others? Where are
they now that we, the men they sent off to war, have
returned? These are the commanders who have deserted
their troops. And there is no more serious crime in the
laws of war. The Army says they never leave their
wounded. The Marines say they never even leave their
dead. These men have left all the casualties and
retreated behind a pious shield of public rectitude.
They've left the real stuff of their reputations
bleaching behind them in the sun in this country....
We wish that a merciful God could wipe away our own
memories of that service as easily as this
administration has wiped away their memories of us. But
all that they have done, and all that they can do by
this denial, is to make more clear than ever our own
determination to undertake one last mission: To search
out and destroy the last vestige of this barbaric war;
to pacify our own hearts; to conquer the hate and fear
that have driven this country these last ten years and
more. And more. And so, when, thirty years from now, our
brothers go down the street without a leg, without an
arm, or a face, and small boys ask why, we will be able
to say "Vietnam" and not mean a desert, not a filthy
obscene memory, but mean instead where America finally
turned, and where soldiers like us helped it in the
turning.